After extensive briefing and oral argument in a JAMS arbitration in California, the Firm secured a Final Award in favor of its client, a leading provider of solar services nationwide, dismissing with prejudice claims that the client had misrepresented and breached allegedly unconscionable terms of a solar lease agreement. The arbitrator found that the terms of the agreement were lawful and had not been breached, and that to the extent the claimant had misunderstood its rights under the agreement, “it was not based on any representations or omissions by [the client].”
